A- de 2020
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
✓Claimant Armando Palau Aldana
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por extemporánea y por falta de legitimación
- Procedencia excepcional
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de modulación de las sentencias C-333/12 y C-532/13.
Considera la Corte que la pretensión real de la memorialista es que se aclare las decisiones adoptadas en los fallos de la referencia.
Luego de constatar que en el presente asunto no se satisfacen los presupuestos de oportunidad y legitimación, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decisión RECHAZAR la petición, por resultar manifiestamente improcedente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, por manifiestamente improcedente, la solicitud de "modulación" de las sentencias C-333 de 2012 y C-532 de 2013, presentada por la ciudadana Cielo Luz Fonseca Sierra.
- SEGUNDO. Contra este auto no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.